<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jay in the fatman &#8211; part five</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themasterofhisdomain.com/2012/07/17/jay-in-the-fatman-part-five/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themasterofhisdomain.com/2012/07/17/jay-in-the-fatman-part-five/</link>
	<description>updated tuesdays and fridays</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 02:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake kale</title>
		<link>http://themasterofhisdomain.com/2012/07/17/jay-in-the-fatman-part-five/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jake kale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themasterofhisdomain.com/?p=3501#comment-2337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s difficult to answer your first question due to the paucity of the available data, presently limited to this one guy and myself. For all I know there could be more, so I can&#039;t give you accurate statistics.

I actually caught the episode you mentioned. I can&#039;t comment on the love triangle issue, but I agree with you about the resolution to the pterosaur problem. Far too quick and easy. Plus, rhamphorhynchoids in the mid Cretaceous? Come on, ornithocheirids would be far more accurate, and more intimidating!

PS: The annoying thing is I forgot to call heads, so I had to toss for it again!
PPS: I&#039;m not sure if the above PS works as a joke, but I&#039;m too tired to come up with anything better, so screw it!
PPPS: The pics will be up soon so be sure to check back next week.
PPPPS: The above PPPS has nothing to do with the above PS or PPS. Just thought I&#039;d set your mind at rest there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s difficult to answer your first question due to the paucity of the available data, presently limited to this one guy and myself. For all I know there could be more, so I can&#8217;t give you accurate statistics.</p>
<p>I actually caught the episode you mentioned. I can&#8217;t comment on the love triangle issue, but I agree with you about the resolution to the pterosaur problem. Far too quick and easy. Plus, rhamphorhynchoids in the mid Cretaceous? Come on, ornithocheirids would be far more accurate, and more intimidating!</p>
<p>PS: The annoying thing is I forgot to call heads, so I had to toss for it again!<br />
PPS: I&#8217;m not sure if the above PS works as a joke, but I&#8217;m too tired to come up with anything better, so screw it!<br />
PPPS: The pics will be up soon so be sure to check back next week.<br />
PPPPS: The above PPPS has nothing to do with the above PS or PPS. Just thought I&#8217;d set your mind at rest there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
